A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design is effective at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, seek to build their family members house. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being made by their potential neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their arranging permission by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to stringent controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have lasting ecological penalties, notably in a sensitive coastal natural environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, and that is partly developed, is in the right posture. Their lawful group has characterised the action being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are both of those remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through waist-high h2o all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Times, a picture which has given that turn into emblematic in the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Get visual proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o for the duration of severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became commonly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment inside the legal timeline.
In the core in the dispute is often a disagreement around boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage that the wall, as created, goes beyond what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their motion is determined by concern for environmental protection and adherence to setting up legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the area as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple just attempting to build a loved ones house in accordance With all the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Specific Region of Conservation and say that every one is effective are performed based René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site upon Specialist information and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like getting into The ocean for the duration of a storm, usually do not alter the underlying info.
The situation has also lifted broader questions about how setting up disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description to get a scenario that lots of observers see as increasingly popular. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Situations posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from pretty different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waistline-high drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Instances and René Collier waded by means of midsection-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared repeatedly in protection, reflecting both the Bodily fact with the coastline and also the symbolic nature of your act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court need to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and preparing circumstances. But the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with each other extensive following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over building is effective at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties which include environmental safety and home rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of purely natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre with the dispute stands partly created, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful thoughts. No matter if it can finally be altered, eradicated, or concluded as planned will count on the court’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably proceed to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Among the most carefully viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.